OK, so if the view is better, why don't more teams use it. Well, one reason is, many stadiums have other things where the camera should be: Luxury boxes, restaurants, bleachers, etc. But there has to be a way around this, no. As Tom Adza, who directs Oakland A's telecasts for Fox Sports Bay Area, says, "In sports TV, we've spent so much money to get better looks at what's happening in a game. But here we show thousands of baseball games on TV every year, and we're not showing the angle that gives the most exact information."Exactly, why the heck is this outdated, and inferior angle still used. Why, when the Yankees spent the national debt building their new stadium, didn't they switch the camera podium to the better, dead-on angle. The Red Sox, for one, switched the camera angle to the dead center view for their local broadcasts and the results and feedback have been positive. Why haven't other teams done it? As of this writing, only 3 teams, Boston, St. Louis and Minnesota have the
dead center view. All of the MLB's other teams, who claim to want the best for their fans, should switch as well.

2 comments:
Makes sense to me, seems like it would add another element of valid complaining though. The umpires get it already from fans on tv while being 15 degrees to the side...imagine what they would hear if all stadiums showed the better shot.
What I want to know is how accurate is the electronic strike zone box every team and the national coverage use?
The electronic strike zone box? Hell, if I put masking tape on my TV, its about as valid as that thing.
Post a Comment